Government imposes pay deal rejected by NHS workers

A quote from Unison’s Pay Matters website:

“Mortgages and rents are increasing; fuel bills are increasing; food prices are on the rise. That’s why pay is important. The government says you must get 2% for the next three years, but inflation is over 4%. At a time when pay rises in the private sector are running near 4% the government is asking you to take a pay cut and accept half the going rate. We say ‘No’. You deserve a fair deal for improving public services and making a real difference to local communities. We want to make sure our members are respected and rewarded with fair pay.”

I couldn’t agree more. It’s a shame, then, that Unison’s lead negotiator Mike Jackson has gone to the Government to ask that it imposes a pay award that will mean three years of pay cuts.

My criticisms here are emphatically not of Unison’s lay members or elected lay representatives. Many of the Unison members I have spoken to over the last few weeks are disgusted by the behaviour of their own senior officials. Pay cuts are not in the interests of any health workers, whatever union we belong to.

On 4th April, Unison and RCN negotiators walked out of joint union pay talks and signed their own deal with the Department of Health and the NHS Employers. This makes a mockery of having a Staff Council that is there to represent every union.

The deal was – and is – an absolute disgrace. The Government loves it; the NHS Employers love it. This is hardly surprising. Inflation currently stands at 4.3%. The Bank of England predicts that it will go far higher than this. Inflation for staple food items is now around 19%. Household energy costs are now predicted to increase by 40% by the end of this year. Petrol costs are set to soar.

What did Unison and RCN negotiators get for us? 2.75% in the first year; followed by an even more pathetic 2.4% in year two and 2.25% in year 3. Forget the minor tweaks to pay bands. This pay deal means pay cuts for NHS workers – this year, and almost certainly for another two years after that.

There was worse to come. After a consultation characterised by an extraordinarily high level of hostility towards other unions, lead negotiator Mike Jackson circulated an immensely damaging email on Friday last week. This included an explicit threat to go to the Government and ask for the deal to be imposed:

“If the statement is agreed it will provide for the pay circular to be issued later next week which will allow for payment of the new rates in July and for the issuing of the new Trade Union Time Off and Facilities agreement (Section 25) If it is not agreed, the unions that have voted to accept (UNISON, RCN, SOR, CDNA, BAOT) will ask the DH/Employers to issue the circular.”

Mike Jackson has done just that – asking the Government to impose the deal over the objections of Unite. The Government imposed the deal this afternoon.

I have been a union activist for 25 years. I have never seen a union behave like this at national level. Unions do have differences – and the place to resolve those differences is within our movement. For a union to go the employers and ask for a deal to be imposed is genuinely shocking.

Are Unison’s lay members responsible for this? Of course not. Unison’s Service Group Executive wasn’t even consulted.

So is this democracy? I don’t think so. Mike Jackson’s email states, “unions representing the majority of staff have accepted the agreement.” If this logic applies, then Unison and the RCN can dictate to all health workers and the rest of us might as well pack up and go home. Those unions who rejected the deal, but then accepted the right of the RCN and Unison to impose it, have done a disservice to their own members – what is the point of being in a union that accepts it has no say on pay and conditions.

But it’s interesting to look at the actual ballots that took place. Unison’s officials have kept very quiet about the ballot turnout, but members tell me of informal reports of 10 to 12%. I’m assuming 12% here. Unison’s claimed membership in health is 452,000. Unite (Amicus) some time ago reported a health membership of 88,000; the actual membership will be higher now. The Unite turnout was around 27%.

So just looking at the Unison and Unite ballot results, based on the reported acceptance percentages of 65% and 5%, around 36,444 health workers voted in favour of the deal. Around 41,556 voted against.

Who else had a ballot? The CSP did – with 98% voting to reject. An impressive 9144 members voted to reject, with only 127 voting to accept. So that shifts the overall ballot totals to 36,571 to accept, and 50,700 to reject.

The GMB balloted, with 96% voting to reject – I don’t know the turnout, so I’m not including the figures here. The RCM and UCATT rejected the offer, I believe without balloting members. Unite (TGWU) rejected, again without a full members ballot. The RCN and CDNA accepted, again without balloting members.

So was there a democratic decision by health workers to accept this deal? No – absolutely not. A clear majority of health workers who were given a vote chose to vote against acceptance.

I’m proud that the members of Unite voted by 95% to reject pay cuts – and proud, too, that our negotiators have followed the very clear mandate given to them by members. Our members also voted to progress now to a ballot on industrial action. That is a decision that I absolutely support.

Why should health workers pay for the Government’s economic crisis? It isn’t acceptable for Brown and Johnson to try and force us to bail them out. It isn’t acceptable for union officials to help them do it.

Advertisements

7 Responses to Government imposes pay deal rejected by NHS workers

  1. Amos Beeves says:

    So where’s your industrial action ballot then? What’s the delay or is this merely sectional posturing by a minority union? Seeing is believing.

  2. Gill George says:

    We have to make decisions about what sort of industrial action we want to go for. We have a Health Service National Committee on July 2nd. That is the appropriate time to make the decisions. Of course, our members, in the ballot, were given two questions – one on the deal and one on industrial action. About 95% of our members voted to reject the deal. Importantly, though, 75% of our members wanted an industrial action ballot. I don’t think our members were posturing.

  3. Andy Ford says:

    How ironic it is now to see the Unison local govt sector making all the opposite arguments to Unison NHS sector. Unison Local govt say that 2.4% is below inflation, RPI is the real measure not CPI, this represents a pay cut for our members, many of whom are low paid…Unison in NHS say that 2.75% is a good deal, CPI is around 2.75%, count your increments towards your pay rise and that abolishing Point 1 of Band 1 (which I estimate no more than 20 people in the NHS will be on) is looking after the low paid! What must their NHS members think as they listen to the Unison soundbites on the news…

  4. DM Andy says:

    Hi Gill,

    UNISON finally released the figures for their pay deal ballot.
    Yes: 49,674 (64.9%)
    No: 26,854 (35.1%)
    Turnout 16.9%

  5. Gill George says:

    The Unison turnour appears to have been higher than some of the rumours that were going around. I’ve put the new figures into my spreadsheet (including Unison, SoR, Unite(Amicus) and the CSP) – the only unions that appear to have had a full ballot – and come out with a similar eresult. For the deal 53,600; against 60,700. A convincing majority to reject.

  6. Shona says:

    locally the Royal College of Nursing have started a recruitment campaign amongst health visitors in our PCT on the grounds that while most health visitors are angry at the pay offer they dont want to go on strike…is this happening elesewherem can we stop them doing this ? whats unite doing nationally or the CPHVA ( I have heard the health visitors had been told they would not be called out on strike) whats going on

  7. Eilis Wood says:

    I know several UNISON members and when i told them that UNISON had voted to accept the offer, they all said they had not had ballot papers – curious, don’t you think??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: